The Dog Whistle Last Night Was to Women

Nona Willis Aronowitz

comments


The debate last night was ostensibly about foreign policy, but as the entire Twitterverse noted, the candidates used their last televised dialogue to bring up whatever they wanted, from education to food stamps. And both Barack Obama and Mitt Romney must have been instructed to bring up the rights of women at every single turn, because that’s exactly what they did.

Romney was the first to pay women lip service by saying we need to “make sure that we're protecting religious minorities and women because these countries can't develop unless all the population, not just half of it, is developing.” A few minutes later, Obama parroted him, saying we need to apply pressure to Egypt’s government “to recognize the rights of women, which is critical throughout the region. These countries can't develop if young women are not given the kind of education that they need.” He later transposed that desire on Pakistan, Somalia, and Yemen.

The candidates’ touching anecdotes pandered to the ladies, too. Obama framed his Osama bin Laden comeback with a story of a young woman at Ground Zero who was relieved bin Laden was dead; Romney hammered home his focus-on-the-economy strategy by recounting a story about a young unemployed woman in Philadelphia, then followed it up with a reference to Ann. If last week’s debate was Ladies’ Night, this one was Remember Us, Ladies? Night.

When it comes to foreign policy, a sitting president will always have the advantage in foreign policy debates over a governor, since he’s the one who’s actually been in the Control Room, so Obama’s references to women’s rights abroad felt a little more substantive. But while I felt ignored during the first debate and energized during the second, last night I just felt used. The pandering makes sense—Obama is well aware that his sizeable lead among women is narrowing, and Romney’s doing everything he can to continue that pattern. But regardless of who we’re going to vote for, we deserve more than vague platitudes or shameless dog whistles. It’s not enough to simply shout out our gender. Both of them should have the balls to back up the name-dropping with policy.

Tags:
election, debates, 2012
See Full Blog Post

next post

previous post

about this blog

MC Bulletin

Here's your one-stop shop for all the things you love about Marie Claire — from fashion and beauty to pop culture and world events.

about the authors

kate schweitzer

Kate Schweitzer is the senior web editor of Marie Claire. She loves traveling (even back to her hometown of St. Louis, Missouri ... go Cards!), eating candy, cheating at Scrabble with her husband, and watching basically everything on TV — so much so that she is a writer for Chaos Theory and Handsome Town, two web comedy series from Emmy-winning PhoebeTV. Follow her on Twitter @kateschweitzer!

contact author see all posts by this author
Alyssa Vingan

Alyssa Vingan is Marie Claire's web editor. She grew up in Virginia, spent her college years in New Orleans, and upon graduation left the Big Easy for the big city. She continually impresses (worries?) her colleagues with her knowledge of obscure models, compulsive collecting of international fashion magazines, and her undying girl-crush on Abbey Lee Kershaw. Follow her on Twitter @alyssavingan!

contact author see all posts by this author

Maura Brannigan is Marie Claire's web assistant. A native of the Windy City, she adores live music, grilled cheese, and the perfect pair of patent leather shoes — and, when possible, all three at once. If she's not writing about the latest in culture, she's probably watching reruns of SNL, pirouetting in ballet class, or cheering for her favorite Chicago sports teams. Follow her on Twitter @maura_brannigan!

contact author see all posts by this author

Daily Giveaway

Win Cover Star Lea Michele's Favorite Beauty Products!

Win Cover Star Lea Michele's Favorite Beauty Products!

enter now
See all giveaways