Is the Biggest Loser Controversy Just Another Example of Fat-Shaming?

Slammed for being too heavy and too thin. Can someone really win the Biggest Loser? By Meredith Fineman

Most Popular
Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

No doubt you've heard the brouhaha surrounding Rachel Frederickson, the winner of this season's The Biggest Loser, who shed 56% of her body weight (a Biggest Loser record), dropping from 260 pounds to a startlingly slim 105. The requisite before and after photos are dramatic--too dramatic, it would seem, because now Frederickson is being slammed for being "too thin". Except the explicit goal of the show is to lose weight.

Most Popular

But if you're Rachel Frederickson, you really can't win, can you? When she was heavier, Frederickson shared how uncomfortable she was in her own skin. Her life was difficult in all the ways you'd expect of a morbidly obese 24-year old. Getting around left her breathless and achy. Her romantic life was nil, and her weight put her at significant risk of diabetes and heart disease. So she threw herself into the competition, insisting that while she ate a healthy 1600 calories a day (under the supervision of a Biggest Loser nutritionist), she exercised for several hours at least four times a day. Not surprisingly, the weight melted away.

Critic and viewers rushed in with their own armchair assessments. She must have an eating disorder! But this very criticism is the raison d'etre of the show itself, which showcases extreme exercise and dieting the way Survivor glorified extreme deprivation. The contestant with the most stamina, the willingness to "do whatever it takes" usually wins. And to the victor go the spoils.

The Biggest Loser is, at its very core, a show about fat shaming. It parades overweight Americans as totems of unhealthy behavior and then incentivizes them to go to absurd and unsustainable lengths to be thin: take a break from your job, live in a house with other people who've committed to nearly identical weight loss goals, enjoy round-the-clock counseling from physicians, nutritionists, and trainers, and enjoy healthy and carefully calibrated food prepared by a chef. How's that for reality television? Is it any wonder that Frederickson would emerge from the experience practically skeletal?

The only surprise is that we haven't seen a contestant this emaciated before now.

In this way, the show also highlights the impossible standards for women, in particular, when it comes to weight. Let's get real: If a man had won, with his ribcage protruding as Frederickson's did, would there be such an outcry about anorexia? Seems unlikely. But for women, there's a much narrower bandwidth of acceptable weight. Fall outside those metrics, on either side, and prepare for some fallout. If we've learned anything from the latest Biggest Loser flap it's that being too thin is as fraught and despised a state as being too fat. Good luck finding the middle ground.

Meredith Fineman is the founder of FinePoint PR. You can read more of her writing here.

Culture
Share
'Game of Thrones' Is Ending After Season 8, But There's Hope for a Spin-Off
Culture
Share
This New Instagram Feature is a Huge Step Toward Ending Online Harassment
Culture
Share
Milo Ventimiglia Can't Stop Talking About Returning to 'Gilmore Girls'
GIF
Culture
Share
What Kind of Wedding You're Going to Have Based on Your Zodiac Sign
Culture
Share
Exclusive: Beyoncé's 17-Year-Old Protégé Sophie Beem on Having the Most Famous Mentor in the World
Culture
Share
32 of the Most Scandalous, Controversial, and Memorable Moments in Summer Olympics History
Culture
Share
Major News: 'Daria' Is Returning to MTV
Culture
Share
Everything You Need to Know About What's Happening with YouTuber Marina Joyce
Culture
Share
The First Trailer for the 'Gilmore Girls' Revival Is Finally Here!
Culture
Share
Just 21 Years Ago, Wal-Mart Pulled "Someday a Woman Will Be President" Shirts from Shelves