Princess Diana Would Have “Loved” and “Embraced” Meghan Markle, Former Royal Butler Says

“I think she would have tried to understand her.”

Princess Diana
(Image credit: Getty)

Had she lived to meet her, Princess Diana would have loved and embraced her daughter-in-law Meghan Markle, former royal butler and close Diana confidante Paul Burrell told The Mirror. Diana died in 1997 at just 36 years old; it would be another 19 years before Diana’s younger son, Prince Harry—only 12 at the time of her death—would meet Meghan in 2016. The couple married in 2018 when, for context, Meghan herself was 36 years old.

Meghan Markle on her 2018 wedding day

(Image credit: Getty Images)

Burrell believes Diana would have taught Meghan how to “survive” in the confines of the royal family, Burrell said, and would have taught her lessons that he said could have extended her time as a working royal, with the former Princess of Wales taking Meghan “under her wing and educat[ing] her” after Meghan first began dating Harry.

“I think Diana would have embraced Meghan [and] I think she would have tried to understand her,” Burrell said. Diana loved America and had even been planning to start a new life in California just before she died and had picked out a home in Malibu for herself and her two sons, Burrell said. “Diana loved America—she loved Americans,” he said. (Meghan is American, hailing from California, where she, Harry, and their two children now live.) “And she understood it was a different culture.” The Malibu property she had her eye on was a “white building clinging to the side of a cliff” not far from where Harry and Meghan have settled in Montecito, Burrell said.

Princess Diana

(Image credit: Getty Images)

“Diana was thrilled at the thought of going to live for some of the year in America,” he said. “There was no way she would have decanted full-time because she was proud of her association with the royal family. But she thought a bolthole as somewhere to escape to, she would love to escape to America.”

Burrell said Harry “must have known” about his mother’s “fondness” for the U.S. before he met Meghan. “In his own way, he’s thought, ‘Well, Meghan’s American, and my mum would have loved Meghan,’” Burrell said.

Prince Harry and Princess Diana

(Image credit: Getty Images)

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle walk side by side

(Image credit: Getty)

Burrell said his close friend would have welcomed Meghan with open arms: “Yes, she would have loved Meghan,” he said. “She would have embraced her. She wouldn’t have agreed with everything that’s happened since, but in the initial days she would have encouraged her, educated her, and embraced her.”

Princess Diana

(Image credit: Anwar Hussein / WireImage for Getty Images)

If Diana would have been alive, Harry and Meghan’s 2020 step back as working members of the royal family might not have happened, Burrell said. “If Diana had been here, she would have taught Meghan how to survive, because one thing Diana knew was how to survive,” he said. “She would have said to her, ‘Be careful. There are lots of snakes in this jungle.’ Meghan never had that in the royal family. There wasn’t a book for her to read on how to be a royal princess. There were no rules written down. She had to learn as Diana had to learn by being thrown in the deep end.”

Close up shot of Meghan Markle

(Image credit: Getty)

With Diana’s help, Burrell is convinced Meghan would have gone on to become a valuable member of the royal family. “What a pity that Diana wasn’t here to educate her daughter-in-law, because things would have been so different,” he said. “In this whole equation, Diana is the missing piece, and if she had been part of it, none of this would have happened.”

Rachel Burchfield
Senior Celebrity and Royals Editor

Rachel Burchfield is a writer, editor, and podcaster whose primary interests are fashion and beauty, society and culture, and, most especially, the British Royal Family and other royal families around the world. She serves as Marie Claire’s Senior Celebrity and Royals Editor and has also contributed to publications like Allure, Cosmopolitan, Elle, Glamour, Harper’s Bazaar, InStyle, People, Vanity Fair, Vogue, and W, among others. Before taking on her current role with Marie Claire, Rachel served as its Weekend Editor and later Royals Editor. She is the cohost of Podcast Royal, a show that was named a top five royal podcast by The New York Times. A voracious reader and lover of books, Rachel also hosts I’d Rather Be Reading, which spotlights the best current nonfiction books hitting the market and interviews the authors of them. Rachel frequently appears as a media commentator, and she or her work has appeared on outlets like NBC’s Today Show, ABC’s Good Morning America, CNN, and more.