Just when you think we've reached the limit on how shameful the president can be, he outdoes himself. This morning, in a series of tweets (opens in new tab), Trump announced that the government will not "accept or allow transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. military." His reasoning, if you can call it that, is that the military cannot be "burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender [sic] in the military would entail."
This news comes a little more than a year after Trump tweeted (opens in new tab) to the LGBT community, "I will fight for you while Hillary brings in more people that will threaten your freedoms and beliefs." Trump doesn't really care about trans people's rights one way or another—just how he can use them to his political advantage.
Thankfully, just because Trump tweets something doesn't make it so; the president cannot simply declare, over Twitter no less, that trans people will not be allowed in the military. But this announcement is a reminder of Trump's fundamental leadership strategy: Attack the most marginalized—especially when they're down.
Trump's agenda is failing in a monumental and public way, people are furious about healthcare, and the president's approval ratings are historically low. Despite claiming that he's signed more bills (opens in new tab) than any president ever (blatantly untrue), Trump has yet to pass one significant piece of legislation. But by making this morning's declaration about trans service members, Trump can not only try to finally have a "win," but also cultivate glowing support from evangelicals and conservatives.
More importantly, it puts Trump in his most comfortable mindset: that of a bully. The trans community is already suffering intense legal and cultural discrimination in the U.S., from hateful 'bathroom bills' (opens in new tab) that keep trans people from using the correct facilities to horrific violence (opens in new tab), especially against trans women of color (opens in new tab). This latest statement from Trump just furthers that dehumanization against an already-suffering group of people. But that is when Trump is most himself.
MORE FROM JESSICA VALENTI
Of course, it should go without saying that Trump's arguments for why trans people should not serve in the military is complete bunk. "Disruption" and "medical costs" are the same reasons cited by those who want to keep cis women out of combat roles. In addition to explicitly sexist ideas about what are "proper" roles for women, the argument from conservatives is that male soldiers would be sexually distracted (opens in new tab) by having women around and that women's healthcare is inherently more expensive (opens in new tab) than men's. Similar arguments were also used to claim that gay people (opens in new tab) shouldn't serve.
Ideas like this were nonsense then—and they're nonsense now. And the people who think them are little more than culture war hold outs, desperate to stop the world from progressing faster than their bigoted minds can handle.
According to the Williams Institute at the UCLA School of Law (opens in new tab), as of 2014 over 150,000 trans people have served in the armed forces or are on current active duty. Enacting the sort of ban Trump is talking about will not necessarily keep trans people from serving, but it would absolutely keep them from serving openly, safely, and receiving any medical care they need.
When the ban on trans people serving openly was lifted last year, Capt. Sage Fox told CNN (opens in new tab), "This is about equality, about civil rights...it's going to go through and send a message to the rest of the world that the U.S. isn't behind everyone [else], that we do care about human rights, that we do care about equality."
What message is our country sending now?
Jessica Valenti is a contributing editor to MarieClaire.com—read her weekly column here.
Jessica Valenti is a columnist and author of five books on feminism, politics, and culture. Her latest book, Sex Object: A Memoir, was a New York Times bestseller. Valenti is also editor of the ground-breaking anthology Yes Means Yes: Visions of Female Sexual Power and a World Without Rape and the founder of Feministing.com, which Columbia Journalism Review called “head and shoulders above almost any writing on women’s issues in mainstream media.” She has a Master’s degree in Women’s and Gender Studies and lives in Brooklyn with her husband and daughter.
Sex Toys For Partner Play
If you thought toys were just for me-time, think again.
By Gabrielle Ulubay
The Cast of 'Money Heist: Korea - Joint Economic Area': Your Guide
Meet Netflix's new cast of thieves.
By Quinci LeGardye
Lawmakers, Activists, and Allies Are Reacting With Fury to 'Roe' Being Overturned
Thousands are taking to Twitter to express their grief and anger.
By Tanya Benedicto Klich
Roe Is Gone. We Have to Keep Fighting.
Democracy always offers a path forward even when we feel thrust into the past.
By Beth Silvers and Sarah Stewart Holland, hosts of Pantsuit Politics Podcast
Current Gun Control Policies Are Ableist
"Solutions" like active shooter drills and arming more people put the rights of gun owners above the rights of America's most vulnerable, including disabled people like myself.
By Heather Tomko
The Supreme Court's Mississippi Abortion Rights Case: What to Know
The case could threaten Roe v. Wade.
By Megan DiTrolio
Sex Trafficking Victims Are Being Punished. A New Law Could Change That.
Victims of sexual abuse are quietly criminalized. Sara's Law protects kids that fight back.
By Dr. Devin J. Buckley and Erin Regan
My Family and I Live in Navajo Nation. We Don't Have Access to Clean Running Water
"They say that the United States is one of the wealthiest countries in the world. Why are citizens still living with no access to clean water?"
By Amanda L. As Told To Rachel Epstein
30 Ways Women Still Aren't Equal to Men
If anyone tries to tell you otherwise, show them these statistics.
By Megan Friedman
Today, on Human Rights Day, the U.S. Must Abolish Child Marriage
In all but six states, American adults can marry people aged 17 and younger.
By Saryn Chorney
Cory Booker and Rosario Dawson's Relationship Is No More
After three years of dating, the power couple have decided they're better off as friends.
By Marie Claire Editors