Periods Don’t Stop for Pandemics—And Neither Have Our Nation’s Moms

Policies touted in the $3.5 trillion budget plan and other Congressional bills are missing a core component of maternal well-being: menstrual access and health.

Sanitary products
(Image credit: Alamy)

After more than a year of headlines documenting the real-time exodus (opens in new tab) of moms from the workforce and an ongoing state of crisis in maternal health and mortality (opens in new tab), the pandemic has forced a long overdue conversation about the systemic inequities of American motherhood.

A slate of federal policies could begin to mend the breach. On August 24, Congress approved the $3.5 trillion budget plan (opens in new tab) that will be utilized for the upcoming reconciliation bill (opens in new tab). This will likely include staples of President Biden’s American Families Plan (opens in new tab), such as an expansion of the child tax credit, paid family and medical leave, and early education funding. Other reforms in play include the Marshall Plan for Moms (opens in new tab), which reflects the demands of a national movement (opens in new tab) to center mothers in the economic recovery, the Black Maternal Health Momnibus Act of 2021 (opens in new tab) to address alarming racial and ethnic disparities in maternal health outcomes, and the Support Through Loss Act (opens in new tab) to establish paid leave for workers who experience pregnancy loss or difficulties related to surrogacy, fertility, and adoption.

As we advance proposals to elevate and ensure the well-being of mothers, we must not neglect another silent impact on maternal and women’s health: Period poverty, a plight that has garnered global attention (opens in new tab) yet remains one of America’s hidden inequities (opens in new tab).

The impact of menstrual inequity runs deep. A 2019 study (opens in new tab) found that among low-income women in St. Louis, nearly half (46 percent) had to choose between buying food and spending money on menstrual products. People experiencing housing insecurity (opens in new tab) report isolation and even illness and infection caused by using tampons and pads for longer than recommended. Sometimes they have to improvise with items like discarded paper bags or newspapers.

For teens (opens in new tab), lack of support and product accessibility (especially for transgender teens who are already facing an unprecedented number of legislative attacks (opens in new tab)) can lead to compromised health and lost classroom time (opens in new tab)—even disciplinary intervention (opens in new tab). The pandemic exacerbated the problem: Many people have been unable to access menstrual products (opens in new tab) from public facilities they once relied on. Another study found that one in 10 college students surveyed (opens in new tab) nationwide were unable to afford menstrual products in the last year, with nearly a quarter of Latina respondents and 20 percent of Black respondents reporting an ongoing lack of access.

Policy leaders have begun to respond. The 2021 state legislative session saw the passage of laws or extensions of fiscal budgets in California (opens in new tab)Colorado (opens in new tab)Georgia (opens in new tab)Oregon (opens in new tab), and Washington (opens in new tab) that ensure the provision of free tampons and pads in secondary schools and universities. And earlier this summer, Louisiana, Maine, and Vermont (opens in new tab) joined the roster of states that have eliminated the sales tax on period supplies—a.k.a. the “tampon tax”—bringing the total number states where people can buy tax-free menstrual products (opens in new tab) to 23.

Efforts to make menstrual products generally more affordable have been popular on a national level, too. For example, a tweak to the federal tax code in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act (opens in new tab), means that tampons, pads, cups, and period underwear can be purchased with pre-tax dollars via employee health savings and flexible spending accounts.

Given the critical impact that reforming SNAP and WIC would have on the mothers who need it most, now is the time to call out this unjust exclusion and set a precedent at the federal level.

Yet the distinct needs of low-income mothers—who not only often have their own periods to manage, but also the periods of those in their care—are overlooked. Women-led households (opens in new tab) are primary participants in many of our nation’s most vital social safety net programs. They’re included among the 42 million (opens in new tab) recipients of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits, formerly known as the Food Stamp Program. Soon-to-be or new moms and their children are also the exclusive recipients of the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC), which offers supplemental food packages and other essential health resources to roughly eight million people.

Shockingly, neither of these programs allow for the purchase of menstrual products. To add insult to injury, the federal government lumps (opens in new tab) tampons and pads in the same “off limits” category as dog food, cigarettes, and liquor.

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines maternal health (opens in new tab) as "the health of women during pregnancy, childbirth, and the postnatal period." For new mothers, the need for menstrual products is most acute immediately following childbirth. Pads to absorb postpartum flow, which can last as long as six weeks, are a necessity for new mothers’ physical and emotional well-being. And, of course, regular menstrual cycles resume once breast-feeding ceases and sooner if babies are fed formula.

Those who rely on food stamps also face significant pressures when it comes to menstrual access and affordability. Cost-effective grocery shopping entails balancing a tight budget with nutritional needs; menstruation implicates this equation, often causing people to choose between having enough menstrual products or enough food on the table. For SNAP recipients with more than one person in the home who menstruates—moms with teens, grandmothers heading multigenerational households—the financial burden increases.

Given the critical impact that reforming SNAP and WIC would have on the mothers who need it most, now is the time to call out these unjust exclusions and set a precedent at the federal level. As Congress drafts the reconciliation bill, members should factor in menstrual access if at all possible; and as they debate other legislative proposals impacting moms, they should prioritize menstrual access from the outset.

Last month, the Biden administration called for an unprecedented expansion of SNAP (opens in new tab). Monthly benefits will rise on average by $36–the largest increase in the program’s history–and go into effect in October. While that is an excellent start, making menstrual products eligible for purchase with food stamps, as well as via WIC, would be a simple and humane addition. Plus, because all purchases made with federal benefits are already exempt by law from state sales tax, this change would effectively eliminate the “tampon tax” for people who have low incomes, no matter where they reside—an exponential win.

Periods don’t stop for pandemics—and neither have our nation’s moms. As the president and members of Congress pledge to ameliorate the burdens carried by struggling mothers, we cannot afford to let them leave the costs of menstruation out of the debate.

Related Story


(Image credit: Design By Morgan McMullen)
Jennifer Weiss-Wolf

Jennifer Weiss-Wolf is the cofounder of Period Equity and a fellow at the Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law. She is the author of Periods Gone Public: Taking a Stand for Menstrual Equity. (opens in new tab)