Melania Would Have Been Deported Under Donald Trump's New Immigration Rules
Lucky he wasn't POTUS in the '90s.
Donald Trump campaigned on a promise to overhaul America's immigration policy, and just 35 days into his presidency, he seems to be sticking to it. In fact the White House's new deportation guidelines are so strict that if he were president in the 1990s, his own wife Melania would have been a candidate for deportation.
[pullquote align='C']The First Lady worked as a model in the States while here on a tourist visa, which constitutes a crime.[/pullquote]
Trump's new deportation demands are a drastic expansion of the Obama administration's policy, which had focused on deporting only undocumented immigrants who were convicted of violent crimes. But the Trump administration's executive order targets people who have committed any crime, including anyone who has "engaged in fraud or willful misrepresentation in connection with any official matter or application before a governmental agency."
According to a report from Slate, two prominent immigration attorneys believe that this policy would apply to the first lady, whoworked as a model in the United States while she was here on a tourist visa in 1996. That's an immigration no-no (legally she would need a work visa, which she acquired a few months later). Though her lawyer issued a statement saying the documents were unfamiliar to him, he never actually said they were fake and never denied the allegation.
"If the current [rules] had been in effect at that time, then she would have certainly been an enforcement priority," Hasan Shafiqullah, deputy attorney at the Legal Aid Society, said in an interview with Slate. Another attorney, New York City immigration specialist Cheryl David, agreed: If Melania worked on her tourist visa, she "definitely violated her status, and if it came to immigration's attention...they certainly could put her into removal proceedings."
Follow Marie Claire on Facebook for the latest celeb news, beauty tips, fascinating reads, livestream video, and more.
Stay In The Know
Select the newsletters you’d like to receive. Then, add your email to sign up.
-
Hannah and Nick Are Already 'Love is Blind' Season 7's Most Infamous Couple—Thanks to a Giant Duck and List of Red Flags
Fans have a lot of thoughts about the former medical salesperson and football player.
By Quinci LeGardye Published
-
So What If Sabrina Carpenter Wears a Wig?
Her curls are part of her costume, but that doesn't make them inauthentic.
By Halie LeSavage Last updated
-
King Charles Shows Off His Fun Side While Trying Samoan Dancing
"He's got the moves."
By Kristin Contino Published
-
Donald Trump Is Ordered to Pay E. Jean Carroll $83.3 Million in Damages
Carroll had filed two defamation suits against the former president.
By Gabrielle Ulubay Published
-
E. Jean Carroll Triumphs Over Donald Trump In Civil Suit
A jury found him liable for sexual abuse and defamation.
By Gabrielle Ulubay Published
-
36 Ways Women Still Aren't Equal to Men
It's just one of the many ways women still aren't equal to men.
By Brooke Knappenberger Last updated
-
How New York's First Female Governor Plans to Fight for Women If Reelected
Kathy Hochul twice came to power because men resigned amid sexual harassment scandals. Here, how she's leading differently.
By Emily Tisch Sussman Last updated
-
Why the 2022 Midterm Elections Are So Critical
As we blaze through a highly charged midterm election season, Swing Left Executive Director Yasmin Radjy highlights rising stars who are fighting for women’s rights.
By Tanya Benedicto Klich Published
-
Tammy Duckworth: 'I’m Mad as Hell' About the Lack of Federal Action on Gun Safety
The Illinois Senator won't let the memory of the Highland Park shooting just fade away.
By Sen. Tammy Duckworth Published
-
Roe Is Gone. We Have to Keep Fighting.
Democracy always offers a path forward even when we feel thrust into the past.
By Beth Silvers and Sarah Stewart Holland, hosts of Pantsuit Politics Podcast Published
-
The Supreme Court's Mississippi Abortion Rights Case: What to Know
The case could threaten Roe v. Wade.
By Megan DiTrolio Published