Celebrity news, beauty, fashion advice, and fascinating features, delivered straight to your inbox!
Thank you for signing up to . You will receive a verification email shortly.
There was a problem. Please refresh the page and try again.
When does the Senate vote on this stuff?How does the Senate confirm Cabinet members?Can Senate Democrats do anything to block Trump's nominations?Does this mean all of Trump's nominations are definitely going to be confirmed?What happens if the Senate doesn't approve some of Trump's nominees?
When Donald Trump is inaugurated on January 20, the Senate will begin voting to approve or reject his Cabinet appointments (opens in new tab). (For a full breakdown of who they are and why they're so polarizing, see our review here (opens in new tab).) And while it's standard operating procedure for an incoming president to get most of his appointment wishes granted, very little about the Trump transition has followed standard operating procedure. So what happens now?
It's likely that Senate Democrats will do their best to block some of the most heavily-criticized nominees, but how does that work? And if the Democrats are successful, what happens next? Here's what you need to know.
When does the Senate vote on this stuff?
None of Trump's nominees can be confirmed until he officially takes office (opens in new tab) on January 20. But in order to minimize the time between a new president's inauguration and the official appointment of his or her Cabinet, the Senate can (and usually does) begin hearings sooner to expedite the process. Hearings about Trump's nominees will likely begin soon after Congress is sworn in on January 3.
All Cabinet-level officials (with the notable exception of the White House Chief of Staff) have to be approved by the Senate, along with more than a thousand other agency heads and senior posts (opens in new tab). The positions that don't require Senate approval are typically advisory roles, like the national security adviser, for example.
How does the Senate confirm Cabinet members?
The president-elect will have to start with official nominations once he's sworn in on January 20. Trump, like presidents before him, has publicly announced his nominations before Inauguration Day to give the Senate a heads up about whom he plans to appoint. These early announcements also give the Senate time to begin vetting early and speed up the confirmation process. Once he's sworn in, Trump will officially nominate his selections.
The next step is the Senate hearings (opens in new tab). The nominations first go to the relevant committee (opens in new tab) (so the Judiciary Committee will vet the nominee for Attorney General, for example), where hearings will be held and the committee will decide how to proceed.
The committee can send the nominee to the floor for voting and can report the nomination favorably, unfavorably, or without recommendation (opens in new tab). Or, alternatively, it can refuse to move on the nominee, which can stall or effectively kill the nomination (opens in new tab). However, the full Senate would then have the option to invoke cloture (opens in new tab) and move things along.
Once the nomination moves to the full Senate floor for vote, a simple majority is required to confirm.
Can Senate Democrats do anything to block Trump's nominations?
Republicans currently enjoy a 52-48 majority in the Senate. A simple majority requires just 51 votes, meaning that the GOP does have the numbers to push through Trump's Cabinet nominees. However, that doesn't mean that Democrats can't make the process difficult.
Democrats can stall or "sit on" nominations and drag out the confirmation process considerably. We already saw Republicans do this (opens in new tab) to hold up (and effectively kill) Barack Obama's nomination of Merrick Garland for the Supreme Court. Any individual senator can place a hold on a candidate (opens in new tab) by asking his or her party leader to delay the vote. This rule was originally intended to give senators a means to delay votes due to things like scheduling conflicts. But now, the informal rule has evolved into one of the minority party's most effective means of blocking a nominee. It's up to the party leader (opens in new tab) to decide if to honor a hold and for how long.
Although Democrats pushed through new "nuclear" rules (opens in new tab) in 2013 that limit procedural filibusters for executive nominations, they can still force up to 30 hours of debate for each of Trump's nominations (opens in new tab)—which could drag the process out for weeks, given the limited hours the Senate has to work with.
In a nutshell, although Senate Democrats can't totally block Trump's Cabinet appointments, they can force hours of debate for each and every one, dragging the confirmation process out for weeks.
Does this mean all of Trump's nominations are definitely going to be confirmed?
No, definitely not. Even though Republicans have the numbers to theoretically push through all of Trump's nominees, that doesn't mean that they will. Some of the more controversial appointments may be opposed by even some Republicans (opens in new tab). It's also possible that, during the course of interviews and hearings for the confirmation process, some nominees may drop out or withdraw.
The last Cabinet nominee to be formally rejected by the Senate was John G. Tower (opens in new tab), who was nominated as Secretary of Defense by George Bush in 1989. It's actually more common for nominees to drop out or be withdrawn from consideration. Most recently, in 2009, President Obama's Secretary of Health & Human Services nominee, (opens in new tab)Tom Daschle (opens in new tab), withdrew about two months into the confirmation process.
What happens if the Senate doesn't approve some of Trump's nominees?
If the Senate doesn't approve some of Trump's nominees for Cabinet, he'll have to go back to the drawing board and nominate new candidates, which would draw the process out even further. This is rare, however, as the Senate has historically tended to approve most presidents' nominations. Very few Cabinet appointments have been rejected outright, the last being Tower in 1989. It's been more common, in recent years, for presidents to withdraw their nominations after extended hearings, but even that is relatively uncommon. It happened just once with President Obama (with Daschle, mentioned above), twice with George W. Bush, and three times with Bill Clinton.
It's worth noting though, that some Democrats have expressed mixed feelings about delaying the approval of Trump's Cabinet and other appointments, pointing to the importance of filling these high-level positions. Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, for example, told Politico (opens in new tab), "My God, I think we should have an attorney general in place on January 20. I sure do believe that." (It's worth noting, however, that Manchin is up for reelection in 2018 in a state that went strongly for Trump in the presidential election.)
Given the importance of filling these offices, it's unlikely that Senate Democrats will push to delay all or even most of Trump's nominations, especially those that he's decided to fill with more mainstream Republican candidates. His more radical and controversial appointments, however, could earn pushback not just from Democrats, but from some traditional Republicans as well, which could leave the president-elect in the position of having to offer up replacement nominees.
Incoming minority leader Sen. Chuck Schumer, of New York, will play an important role in the confirmation process. And he's made his feelings about Trump's appointees very clear. "President-elect Trump promised that he was going to clean up the swamp, and a whole lot of his nominees have had their career in the swamp," Schumer told the New York Times (opens in new tab).
Follow Marie Claire on Facebook (opens in new tab) for the latest celeb news, beauty tips, fascinating reads, livestream video, and more.
Kayleigh Roberts is a freelance writer and editor with more than 10 years of professional experience. Her byline has appeared in Marie Claire, Cosmopolitan, ELLE, Harper’s Bazaar, The Atlantic, Allure, Entertainment Weekly, MTV, Bustle, Refinery29, Girls’ Life Magazine, Just Jared, and Tiger Beat, among other publications. She's a graduate of the Medill School of Journalism at Northwestern University.
Camilla “Spat Out Tea” When Prince Harry Suggested a Mediator Help Resolve Family Drama
“She told Harry it was ridiculous.”
By Rachel Burchfield
Here’s What Fascinated Prince George, Princess Charlotte, and Prince Louis the Most About the Queen’s Funeral Plans
We’d be curious, too.
By Rachel Burchfield
Meghan Markle Reportedly Sent Letter to King Charles III Asking to Meet One-on-One
It was her attempt to clear the air.
By Rachel Burchfield
How New York's First Female Governor Plans to Fight for Women If Reelected
Kathy Hochul twice came to power because men resigned amid sexual harassment scandals. Here, how she's leading differently.
By Emily Tisch Sussman
Why the 2022 Midterm Elections Are So Critical
As we blaze through a highly charged midterm election season, Swing Left Executive Director Yasmin Radjy highlights rising stars who are fighting for women’s rights.
By Tanya Benedicto Klich
Tammy Duckworth: 'I’m Mad as Hell' About the Lack of Federal Action on Gun Safety
The Illinois Senator won't let the memory of the Highland Park shooting just fade away.
By Sen. Tammy Duckworth
Roe Is Gone. We Have to Keep Fighting.
Democracy always offers a path forward even when we feel thrust into the past.
By Beth Silvers and Sarah Stewart Holland, hosts of Pantsuit Politics Podcast
The Supreme Court's Mississippi Abortion Rights Case: What to Know
The case could threaten Roe v. Wade.
By Megan DiTrolio
Sex Trafficking Victims Are Being Punished. A New Law Could Change That.
Victims of sexual abuse are quietly criminalized. Sara's Law protects kids that fight back.
By Dr. Devin J. Buckley and Erin Regan
My Family and I Live in Navajo Nation. We Don't Have Access to Clean Running Water
"They say that the United States is one of the wealthiest countries in the world. Why are citizens still living with no access to clean water?"
By Amanda L. As Told To Rachel Epstein
30 Ways Women Still Aren't Equal to Men
If anyone tries to tell you otherwise, show them these statistics.
By Megan Friedman