By Diana Pearl
The decision to terminate a pregnancy isn't a quick one. It's not comprable to putting another piercing in your ear or choosing what image or words you want for your long-awaited tattoo. It's an choice even more deeply personal than that that. It takes much deliberation or lifelong convictions to come to. But politicians in the state of Missouri seem to think that pushing off a woman's abortion will be the key to preventing it from happening at all.
Now, women in Missouri will have a government-mandated three day waiting period in between their first consultation and when they are actually able to have their abortion performed—with no exception for victims of rape or incest. This isn't the first waiting period that's been put into place in Missouri, but rather an increase—it previously was 24 hours.
This tripled waiting period makes the limits to accessing abortion care in Missouri even more stringent than they already were. There's just one operating abortion clinic within the state's borders, in St. Louis. For a woman driving across the state, the endeavor will turn into either an extended or a multi-day trip just to undergo the procedure. How super inconvenient, which is exactly their point. Not only does this new mandate increase the time involved in a woman's abortion experience, it ups the financial burden as well. Two appointments, two trips to a potentially far-away clinic, two times the expenses. Even without the waiting period, economic constraints already hinder women from getting the abortions they desire. With it, the hardship is even greater.
The legislation came close to being wiped from the law books thanks to the state's governor, Jay Nixon, who said the bill was "extreme and disrespectful" due to its all-inclusive nature, with no exceptions for victims of rape or incest. Despite his objections, conservative officials in the state legislature were able to override his veto, giving Missouri the second longest waiting period in the nation after South Dakota, which also has a 72-hour wait, but excludes weekends and holidays.
That's not the only threat to reproductive healthcare that's coming out of Missouri. Missouri state rep. Paul Joseph Wieland is currently suing the Obama administration. Why? He claims that the Affordable Health Care Act's mandated insurance coverage of birth control violates his religious beliefs. His suit has a personal angle—he has three teenage daughters, and wants to ensure that they will not be able to access birth control. If his daughters stay on his insurance plan until the allowed age of 26, that's a long road of ahead without oral contraception.
The completely ludicrous nature of this suit is evidence that most likely, nothing will ever come of it, but it's a startling reminder of the type of people who hold political power in Missouri. We're not sure who we feel worse for—the women in Missouri who have to wait three days to get the abortions that they legally have the right to; or the daughters of State Rep. Wieland, whose parents are so against them having access to birth control that they're suing the President over it.
Image via Getty Images
Nebulyft’s Newest Launch Is Going to Change the Way You Think About Aging, Guaranteed.
Sponsored Meet the N1 Multipolar Micro-RF Anti-Aging Device.
By Sponsored •
Nordstrom's Black Friday 2021 Sale: Our Picks
One of the biggest sales of the year has begun!
By The Editors •
Kate Middleton's Ray-Ban Sunglasses Are 30% Off for Black Friday
Both her favorite sunglasses styles are on sale!
By Sally Holmes •
EMILY's List President Laphonza Butler Has Big Plans for the Organization
Under Butler's leadership, the largest resource for women in politics aims to expand Black political power and become more accessible for candidates across the nation.
By Rachel Epstein •
Want to Fight for Abortion Rights in Texas? Raise Your Voice to State Legislators
Emily Cain, executive director of EMILY's List and and former Minority Leader in Maine, says that to stop the assault on reproductive rights, we need to start demanding more from our state legislatures.
By Emily Cain •
Your Abortion Questions, Answered
Here, MC debunks common abortion myths you may be increasingly hearing since Texas' near-total abortion ban went into effect.
By Rachel Epstein •
Trump Vows to Appoint Pro-Life Judge to Supreme Court
In a new interview with 60 Minutes, the President Elect confirms his stance on Roe v. Wade.
By Sally Holmes •
The Future of Afghan Women and Girls Depends on What We Do Next
Between the U.S. occupation and the Taliban, supporting resettlement for Afghan women and vulnerable individuals is long overdue.
By Rona Akbari •
How to Help Afghanistan Refugees and Those Who Need Aid
With the situation rapidly evolving, organizations are desperate for help.
By Katherine J Igoe •
It’s Time to Give Domestic Workers the Protections They Deserve
The National Domestic Workers Bill of Rights, reintroduced today, would establish a new set of standards for the people who work in our homes and take a vital step towards racial and gender equity.
By Ai-jen Poo •
The Biden Administration Announced It Will Remove the Hyde Amendment
The pledge was just one of many gender equity commitments made by the administration, including the creation of the first U.S. National Action Plan on Gender-Based Violence.
By Megan DiTrolio •