If last week in the royal universe was all about royal houses, this week it’s all about royal titles. For the first time, we saw Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s children Archie and Lilibet referred to as “Prince” and “Princess,” including an official update by Buckingham Palace early Thursday morning to the royal family’s website and its line of succession. (Prior to this week’s change to “Prince Archie of Sussex” and “Princess Lilibet of Sussex,” the two were referred to as “Master Archie Mountbatten-Windsor” and “Miss Lilibet Mountbatten-Windsor.”)
And, to avoid any question as to the change, Harry and Meghan wrote decisively in a statement “The children’s titles have been a birthright since their grandfather became monarch. This matter has been settled for some time in alignment with Buckingham Palace.”
According to Page Six, Archie and Lilibet were officially given the titles last year, before Christmas. Though it does appear the matter has been settled for some time, the first use of either of the Sussex children by their royal titles came when it was announced in a March 8 statement from Harry and Meghan’s spokesperson that “Princess Lilibet Diana” had been christened on March 3, the Friday prior. The next day, March 9, the royal family website was updated.
Though we are only now referring to Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet as such, technically Harry and Meghan are correct in saying that they have had a birthright to use said titles since September 8, when their grandfather King Charles ascended to the throne. (This is pursuant to a Letters Patent issued by King George V in 1917, which said that any child of a son of the monarch—which Archie and Lilibet are—are entitled to use the style “Prince” or “Princess,” as well as “His Royal Highness” or “Her Royal Highness.”) Even though this is true, it took six months to the day for anyone to publicly acknowledge the children by said titles. The royal family website was updated after Her late Majesty’s death, but only to reflect the new titles of Prince William’s family, not Harry’s.
“After the Queen died, updates were made to the royal website,” a Page Six source says, referring to William and Kate’s new titles of Prince and Princess of Wales (they were previously the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge). “Despite their birthright, Archie and Lilibet were not given their titles. If the titles had just been updated, along with everyone else, there would be no story.”
But, because they weren’t, rumors swirled that it was because of the ongoing rift between Charles and Harry.
A source speaking to The Mirror says that Harry and Meghan were “frustrated” that the Palace didn’t immediately recognize their children as Prince and Princess, telling the outlet “It’s no secret among their friends that Harry and Meghan were frustrated Buckingham Palace failed to immediately recognize Archie and Lilibet’s elevated status on its website. It was compounded further when the Prince and Princess of Wales’s titles, and those of their children, were swiftly changed following the Queen’s death in September.”
OK reports that Harry and Meghan “do not plan to use the titles in casual conversations or everyday life. It will only be used in formal situations.” Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet are sixth and seventh in line to the British throne, respectively.
Rachel Burchfield is a writer whose primary interests are fashion and beauty, society and culture, and, most especially, the British Royal Family. In addition to serving as the royal editor at Marie Claire, she has worked with publications like Vogue, Vanity Fair, ELLE, Harper’s Bazaar, and more. She cohosts Podcast Royal, a show that provides candid commentary on the biggest royal family headlines and offers segments on fashion, beauty, health and wellness, and lifestyle.
The Agenda: Los Angeles
How to prepare for a visit to the City of Angels.
By Brooke Knappenberger
Our Editor's Favorite Curl-Defining Leave-In Conditioner Doubles As a Moisturizer for Skin
Stay hydrated, stay happy.
By Gabrielle Ulubay
Lucy Liu Opened Up About Her Decision to Have a Child Via Surrogate in Her Late 40s: "I Didn't Have a Plan"
It felt like the right time for her.
By Iris Goldsztajn