A new ruling from the Supreme Court, issued on Tuesday, is a major setback for abortion rights advocates. In a 5-4 vote, the court overturned a California state law that required “crisis pregnancy centers” to inform women about access to abortion. Here’s what you need to know about the decision.
Crisis pregnancy centers are run by anti-choice advocates, with the goal of convincing pregnant women to not get an abortion, and instead choose to put their child up for adoption or become parents. According to NPR, there are about 2,700 of these centers across the country, and many receive state and federal funding. According to PolitiFact, many groups maintain that crisis pregnancy centers vastly outnumber abortion clinics in America, but the numbers are hard to pin down, as such clinics aren't necessarily licensed and therefore not tallied in any database.
Critics say these centers intentionally mislead women who are seeking abortions, especially because they have similar names to abortion clinics and their employees wear scrubs and white coats, ask about their medical history, and even provide ultrasounds. “Fake health centers try to trick women into entering these facilities by masquerading as full-service women’s health clinics,” NARAL Pro-Choice America’s website argues. “Some even claim to provide abortion care to get women in the door, and then use lies and manipulation to try to dissuade them from considering abortion.”
In a law called the FACT Act, California had required centers licensed by the state to post notices informing women that there were free or low-cost abortion options for low-income women. The notices also had to include a phone number women could call to find out more about their options to terminate a pregnancy. Clinics that weren’t licensed and may not have medical staff didn’t have to post notices, but they did have to note they weren’t licensed as medical facilities.
SCOTUS acknowledged the deception of fake women’s deception is real, but 5 of them STILL refused to #EndTheLies. Trump & the GOP are stacking our courts w/ anti-choice zealots & today has shown our rights are in danger now more than ever. We won’t stop fighting. #NIFLAvBecerra pic.twitter.com/pQJ8OkUdKQJune 26, 2018
The National Institute of Family and Life Advocates, a religious group representing crisis pregnancy centers, argued that being forced to post those notices violated their right to free speech, because they had to advertise something that was against their belief system. Jay Sekulow, a lawyer with the group, said in a brief that nobody should be forced "to act as a ventriloquist's dummy for a government-dictated message."
But the state argued that low-income women needed to be made aware of the state's reproductive health resources, and crisis pregnancy centers may mislead people about their options. An appeals court initially upheld the law, arguing it protected the health of California residents without necessarily encouraging them to terminate pregnancies. But other appeals courts had declared similar laws unconstitutional.
Today’s 5-4 #SCOTUS ruling in the #NIFLAvBecerra case sends a clear message that California’s attempt to force pregnancy centers to advertise and refer for abortion is an attack on their Constitutional right to free speech!@NIFLA #ProLife #GiveFreeSpeechLife pic.twitter.com/tOCEFgE9ulJune 26, 2018
The Supreme Court sent the case back to lower courts for further proceedings, and said the clinics are “likely to succeed” in their challenge to the FACT Act. Their decision will probably affect similar laws in states including Hawaii and Illinois, since those laws are also being challenged in court.
Meanwhile, the court has upheld laws requiring doctors in abortion clinics to tell patients about alternatives to abortion. In some states, doctors have to display a sonogram and describe the fetus. In his dissenting opinion, Justice Stephen Breyer noted this disparity. “After all, the law must be evenhanded,” he wrote.
Stay In The Know
Marie Claire email subscribers get intel on fashion and beauty trends, hot-off-the-press celebrity news, and more. Sign up here.
Megan Friedman is the former managing editor of the Newsroom at Hearst. She's worked at NBC and Time, and is a graduate of Northwestern's Medill School of Journalism.
Martha Stewart Responds to Constant Speculation About Plastic Surgery
Not that it's any of y'all's business!
By Iris Goldsztajn
Meet the New Spring Handbag Collection Our Editors Are Excited to Shop
It's a pastel party.
By Raina Mendonça
At Fashion Week, Hats Are the New Hair
Indulgent and quirky, the fall 2024 runways have spoken in favor of fancy headwear.
By Sara Holzman
36 Ways Women Still Aren't Equal to Men
It's just one of the many ways women still aren't equal to men.
By Brooke Knappenberger
How New York's First Female Governor Plans to Fight for Women If Reelected
Kathy Hochul twice came to power because men resigned amid sexual harassment scandals. Here, how she's leading differently.
By Emily Tisch Sussman
Why the 2022 Midterm Elections Are So Critical
As we blaze through a highly charged midterm election season, Swing Left Executive Director Yasmin Radjy highlights rising stars who are fighting for women’s rights.
By Tanya Benedicto Klich
Tammy Duckworth: 'I’m Mad as Hell' About the Lack of Federal Action on Gun Safety
The Illinois Senator won't let the memory of the Highland Park shooting just fade away.
By Sen. Tammy Duckworth
Roe Is Gone. We Have to Keep Fighting.
Democracy always offers a path forward even when we feel thrust into the past.
By Beth Silvers and Sarah Stewart Holland, hosts of Pantsuit Politics Podcast
The Supreme Court's Mississippi Abortion Rights Case: What to Know
The case could threaten Roe v. Wade.
By Megan DiTrolio
Sex Trafficking Victims Are Being Punished. A New Law Could Change That.
Victims of sexual abuse are quietly criminalized. Sara's Law protects kids that fight back.
By Dr. Devin J. Buckley and Erin Regan
My Family and I Live in Navajo Nation. We Don't Have Access to Clean Running Water
"They say that the United States is one of the wealthiest countries in the world. Why are citizens still living with no access to clean water?"
By Amanda L. As Told To Rachel Epstein