
Every fan (or foe) of the royals wants to know what really goes on behind palace doors. Thankfully a must-read new article in The New Yorker (opens in new tab)about Prince Harry and Meghan Markle did just that, diving deep into their now-notorious separation from their senior royal titles. One of the most interesting tidbits from the article was the exploration of the relationship between Markle and the Buckingham Palace staff; the latter were described as "less enamored of the very qualities that made her irresistible to the press: her showbiz lustre, self-confidence, and feminist habits of assertion." Before the wedding, according to the article, Meghan had been considered "imperious" by staff.
According to Camilla Tominey (opens in new tab), an editor at the Daily Telegraph who had covered the royal family for more than a decade when Markle arrived at the Palace, she wasn't well received. Tominey explained it had to do with the clashing of cultures: Markle and the Palace were operating on two very different speeds. "She had come from the celebrity world, which is very fast-paced and quite demanding," said Tominey. "The royal world is very different—it's much slower-paced and hugely hierarchical. In the royal world, it's 'What should we do next?' 'Well, what did we do last time?'"
Tominey continued: "It's a bit like Downton Abbey (opens in new tab)—there's a hierarchy of staff who have been at Buckingham Palace for years and years, to serve Queen and country," she said. "And, therefore, for Harry and Meghan to be making demands, there was a bit of below-stairs chatter, particularly with the Duchess, that was 'Well, hang on a minute, who do you think you are?'"
That said, Meghan and Harry appeared to have a great relationship with their Frogmore Cottage staff, bidding them goodbye with a teary goodbye lunch. (opens in new tab) Hopefully, there are no hard feelings, especially now that they're spending their days in sunny L.A. (opens in new tab) as a family with Archie.
For more stories like this, including celebrity news, beauty and fashion advice, savvy political commentary, and fascinating features, sign up for the Marie Claire newsletter.
subscribe here (opens in new tab)
RELATED STORIES
Bianca Rodriguez is the Fashion & Luxury Commerce Manager at Hearst Magazines, covering fashion, beauty, and more for Cosmopolitan, Elle, Esquire, Harper’s BAZAAR, and Town & Country. She likes lounging about with a good book and thinks a closet without platform sneakers is a travesty.
-
Princess Kate Is a "Textbook Capricorn," Astrologer Says
Can relate.
By Iris Goldsztajn
-
Royals Probably "Laughed" About Kim Kardashian Buying Princess Diana's Necklace, Expert Claims
It's probably not a big deal to them.
By Iris Goldsztajn
-
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle Are Likely "Shocked" by the "Negative Pushback" Over 'Spare,' Royal Expert Says
They thought it would be more like the aftermath of Oprah.
By Iris Goldsztajn
-
Princess Diana Didn't Want to Move Away From England, Her Former Butler Claims
Obviously, we can't ever really know the truth.
By Iris Goldsztajn
-
King Charles Will Not Hold "Peace Talks" With Harry and Meghan Before the Coronation, Royal Expert Claims
Oh.
By Iris Goldsztajn
-
Princess Diana's Butler Responds to Prince Harry Referring to Him as "The Butler" in 'Spare'
Paul Burrell says he's confused and hurt.
By Iris Goldsztajn
-
Princess Eugenie's New Baby Will Allow the Royal Family to "Put Behind Them a Year of Sorrow and Conflict," Astrologer Says
All good things!
By Iris Goldsztajn
-
Prince Harry "Should Have Been Prince William's Wingman," Has Become His "Hitman" Instead, Royal Expert Says
That doesn't sound good.
By Iris Goldsztajn