Is There an Oscars "Popular Film" Category After All This Year?

Drama. So much drama.

Performance, Award, Technology, Event, Competition, Trophy, Figurine, Performing arts,
(Image credit: Handout)

The ceremony hasn't even started yet, and already the 2019 Oscars have been rife with drama. Will there be a host? Will that host be Kevin Hart? Can the Academy come up with the big names for presenters? Amid all of the back-and-forth, you might have missed the controversy of the Academy Award for Outstanding Achievement in Popular Film, which was dreamed up by the Academy in August 2018.

Almost immediately, the Popular Film category was besieged by almost universal criticism from board members, actors, film critics, and the public (a.k.a. Twitter), and was removed...almost immediately after that! So, no, nothing has changed, but it was a whole thing. Here's how it all shook out.

The Oscars is evolving.

So, there has been a long history of conflict between the Academy wanting to honor artistic excellence, specifically in the realm of artsy films that might not have played to a wider audience, and wanting to honor films that did well commercially.


Marie Claire Logo

(Image credit: Marie Claire)

Dawn Hudson, CEO of the Academy, spoke about wanting to “honor excellence across a wider scope of films” to the New York Times. At the same time, the Oscars are obviously a huge night, and the Academy wants to draw big names and big viewing numbers for what a lot of people consider to be the biggest awards ceremony of the year. There's been some recent effort on the Academy's part to modernize the event (and also condense it, since it can run well over three hours).

And the new category just caused more confusion.

In August, the Academy announced the creation of the Popular Film Oscar, but didn't really provide a lot of details on what might, in fact, be a "popular" film. Was the list going to be automatically generated by box office numbers? (And the follow-up question: Does that mean it would be entirely superhero and Transformer movies?)

The example of Black Panther, which did get a Best Picture nom, was used as an example. If it hadn't gotten a Best Picture nomination, would a "Popular Film" nomination serve as the next best thing? Why even have the category in the first place? In context, some speculated the nomination could serve as a token nomination, like giving a pity invite to films that did well at the box office but weren't worthy of the "real" awards.

So the Academy nixed it soon after.

Just as quickly as the Academy made the announcement, they decided against it and made a formal announcement in September 2018. CEO of the Academy, Dawn Hudson, said, “There has been a wide range of reactions to the introduction of a new award, and we recognize the need for further discussion with our members.”


Film Title: Mamma Mia! Here We Go Again

(Image credit: Photo Credit: Jonathan Prime)

“Our intention was always excellence first, but I don’t think that was clear in the initial announcement,” Hudson also admitted in the statement. “We want to include a wider scope of films, but making the change nine months into the awards year created anxiety.”

Now what?

So, basically, there's still interest in bringing in films that were popular (including some of our editors' favorite films, like Mamma Mia 2 and Paddington 2) but still not a ton of insight to do that. There will definitely be more discussion to come as the Oscars evolve and become more inclusive—in more ways than one, hopefully.

For more stories like this, including celebrity news, beauty and fashion advice, savvy political commentary, and fascinating features, sign up for the Marie Claire newsletter.



People, Green, Friendship, Beauty, Fun, Leaf, Photography, Tree, Photo shoot, Uniform,

(Image credit: Universal Pictures)

Hair, Hairstyle, Fashion, Beauty, Blond, Long hair, Dress, Fashion model, Brown hair, Photography,

(Image credit: Getty Images)
Katherine J. Igoe
Contributing Editor

Katherine’s a contributing syndications editor at Marie Claire who covers fashion, culture, and lifestyle. In her role, she writes stories that are syndicated by MSN and other outlets. She’s been a full-time freelancer for over a decade and has had roles with Cosmopolitan (where she covered lifestyle, culture, and fashion SEO content) and Bustle (where she was their movies and culture writer). She has bylines in New York TimesParentsInStyle, Refinery29, and elsewhere. Her work has also been syndicated by ELLEHarper’s BazaarSeventeenGood Housekeeping, and Women’s Health, among others. In addition to her stories reaching millions of readers, content she's written and edited has qualified for a Bell Ringer Award and received a Communicator Award. 

Katherine has a BA in English and art history from the University of Notre Dame and an MA in art business from the Sotheby's Institute of Art (with a focus on marketing/communications). She covers a wide breadth of topics: she's written about how to find the very best petite jeanshow sustainable travel has found its footing on Instagram, and what it's like to be a professional advice-giver in the modern world. Her personal essays have run the gamut from learning to dress as a queer woman to navigating food allergies as a mom. She also has deep knowledge of SEO/EATT, affiliate revenue, commerce, and social media; she regularly edits the work of other writers. She speaks at writing-related events and podcasts about freelancing and journalism, mentors students and other new writers, and consults on coursework. Currently, Katherine lives in Boston with her husband and two kids, and you can follow her on Instagram. If you're wondering about her last name, it’s “I go to dinner,” not “Her huge ego,” but she responds to both.