Why Doesn't Prince Harry Use His Real Name?
An investigation.


I've been covering the royal wedding (opens in new tab) since before we even knew there would be a royal wedding, and somehow only a few days before the worldwide event (opens in new tab) I discovered that Prince Harry is not actually Prince Harry. He's Prince Henry of Wales, a.k.a. Henry Charles Albert David. HOW DID I NOT KNOW THIS?
Before you ask—yes—I know that Meghan Markle isn't really Meghan Markle, either. She's Rachel Meghan Markle. We share the same name (along with her Suits character (opens in new tab)). So now we have two people who don't use their real names as the newly appointed Duke and Duchess of Sussex (opens in new tab). I obviously had to find out everything I knew about their names, so here we are.
Harry is a nickname for Henry.
Harry has been a popular nickname for Henry for centuries (opens in new tab). Who knew? Now, "Henry" is only used when referring to Harry's official title. He's been called "Harry" since he was a child so why not just name him Harry, you ask? We'll never know. It's rumored there were some name disagreements (opens in new tab) between his parents Princess Diana and Prince Charles.
Harry's real name was used on the official engagement announcement.
"His royal highness Prince Henry of Wales and Ms. Meghan Markle are engaged to be married."
The Prince of Wales is delighted to announce the engagement of Prince Harry to Ms. Meghan Markle. pic.twitter.com/zdaHR4mcY6November 27, 2017
So, why wasn't Meghan's?
It's unclear why her formal name wasn't on the announcement, but it was used in the formal Instrument of Consent (opens in new tab) signed by the Queen that allows Prince Harry to marry Meghan (opens in new tab) Rachel. When Harry and Meghan said their vows at their wedding, the bishop referred to Meghan as "Rachel Meghan Markle" at first (opens in new tab), then continued to use "Meghan."
The Queen has officially given her consent for the marriage of her "most dearly beloved grandson" Prince Harry to Meghan Markle pic.twitter.com/jZ7gSaA5thMarch 15, 2018
Okay, great, so "Rachel" is only used on formal documents. However, on Meghan's new Royal Family bio page (opens in new tab) they write that Meghan was "born Meghan Markle" when, in fact, she wasn't. What is the truth?!
"The Duchess of Sussex, born Meghan Markle, married Prince Harry at St George's Chapel, Windsor in May 2018."
Meghan is not "Princess Meghan" either (or Princess Rachel, for that matter)—she's Her Royal Highness Princess Henry of Wales. Only those who are born into the royal family (opens in new tab) can use the title Prince or Princess, followed by their first name. In other words, we should have been calling Harry's mom "Diana, Princess of Wales," (opens in new tab) not Princess Diana.
Harry and Meghan won't use their surname either.
Meghan and Harry's surname is "Mountbatten-Windsor." (Quite a mouthful, I don't blame them.) According to the Royal Family website (opens in new tab), "Members of the Royal Family can be known both by the name of the Royal house, and by a surname, which are not always the same. And often they do not use a surname at all." Here's the full story:
"The Royal Family name of Windsor was confirmed by The Queen after her accession in 1952. However, in 1960, The Queen and The Duke of Edinburgh decided that they would like their own direct descendants to be distinguished from the rest of the Royal Family (without changing the name of the Royal House), as Windsor is the surname used by all the male and unmarried female descendants of George V.
It was therefore declared in the Privy Council that The Queen's descendants, other than those with the style of Royal Highness and the title of Prince/Princess, or female descendants who marry, would carry the name of Mountbatten-Windsor.
This reflected Prince Philip's surname. In 1947, when Prince Philip of Greece became naturalised, he assumed the name of Philip Mountbatten as a Lieutenant in the Royal Navy.
The effect of the declaration was that all The Queen's children, on occasions when they needed a surname, would have the surname Mountbatten-Windsor."
RELATED STORIES
Rachel Epstein is an editor at Marie Claire, where she writes and edits culture, politics, and lifestyle stories ranging from op-eds to profiles to ambitious packages. She also manages the site’s virtual book club, #ReadWithMC. Offline, she’s likely watching a Heat game, finding a new coffee shop, or analyzing your cousin's birth chart—in no particular order.
-
Sex Toys For Partner Play
If you thought toys were just for me-time, think again.
By Gabrielle Ulubay
-
The Cast of 'Money Heist: Korea - Joint Economic Area': Your Guide
Meet Netflix's new cast of thieves.
By Quinci LeGardye
-
Lawmakers, Activists, and Allies Are Reacting With Fury to 'Roe' Being Overturned
Thousands are taking to Twitter to express their grief and anger.
By Tanya Benedicto Klich
-
How Princess Diana and Duchess Camilla's Birth Charts Predicted Compatibility With Prince Charles: Astrologer
Diana and Camilla share the same sun sign.
By Iris Goldsztajn
-
Kate Middleton Is "Frantically" Trying to Repair Princes William and Harry's Bond, Reportedly
Good for her!
By Iris Goldsztajn
-
Prince William Can't Recognize Prince Harry, As Relationship Reportedly Suffers Irreparable "Damage"
This is so so sad.
By Iris Goldsztajn
-
Kate Middleton and Prince William Drank Beer and Played Soccer After a Kind of Uncomfortable Portrait Unveiling
They looked uncharacteristically nervous.
By Iris Goldsztajn
-
The Cambridges Shine in Cambridge on Official Visit to Their Dukedom
A new portrait of the couple is being unveiled.
By Iris Goldsztajn
-
Why Kate Middleton Wore White to Mark Windrush Day: Body Language Expert
It shows discretion and humility.
By Iris Goldsztajn
-
Prince William and Kate Middleton Know When to Show PDA—And When to Hold Back: Body Language Expert
It depends what the engagement consists of.
By Iris Goldsztajn
-
Prince William Acknowledged the Great Contributions of Caribbean People Who Came to the U.K. in Windrush Day Speech
He also denounced the still prevalent problem of racism in the U.K. today.
By Iris Goldsztajn